Over 10,000 installations for customers nationally
Download the Brochure
Welcome to our blog

Direct Response Home Security took another industry initiative by adopting a Zero Landfill Tolerance policy.

February 21st, 2011

Not only that, they are encouraging their clients and prospective customers to do the same!

Managing Director David Price said “As one of the largest alarm companies in the business, we realised that it was time to stand up and be counted. We remove and upgrade hundreds of old alarms every year and I can now pledge that they will be 100% re-cycled.”

Direct Response are pleased to be working with Re-cycle Technology Limited, who are able to totally re-cycle the old equipment.

Doug Brown of Re-cycle Technology said, “This is no problem for us and we are pleased to welcome Direct Response to our client base.

This equipment contains printed circuit boards, copper wire, batteries, steel etc. It will all be turned into new electronic equipment, toys and general household items bought by us all. Well done Direct Response!”.

As one of the market leaders in this ‘Hi-Tech’ business, Direct Response were looking for a way to make a difference and reduce it’s carbon footprint. They are encouraging their clients to re-cycle and re-new. The new equipment is a lot more eco friendly, (manufactured by Honeywell) than some of the older systems. So by making unbelievable ’scrappage’ and ‘trade in’ offers the company really is putting it’s best (eco) foot forward!

But it does not stop there. Direct Response are partnering with alarm companies all over the country and making the latest monitoring equipment available to all.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Homeowners Should Be Able To Use Greater Force Our Survey Suggests

June 17th, 2010

The initial results of our survey to find out what people think should be the amount of force householders should be allowed to use to protect themselves, their family and their property from intruders are quite clear cut.

When asked “Do you think people should be allowed to use greater force to protect themselves without the risk of being prosecuted?” an overwhelming majority of 92.3% said “yes”. Only 7.7% answered “no”.

The results to the question “Do you think the law should allow the use of lethal force in situations where someone has broken in and the householder can prove that extreme violence was the only means of defending themselves and their property from attack?” were equally unambiguous. When asked this 92.9% said “yes”, 0.0% said “no”, and 7.1% answered “don’t know”.

Our survey is in response to a statement in the crime and policing section of the government’s coalition agreement, which says: “We will ensure people have the protection needed when they defend themselves against intruders”.

We’d like to know how far you think the government should go to ensure people’s safety against intruders so we’d like you to take part in our survey. It’s very simple and quick to answer, and it’s completely anonymous.

Once we have the full results in we’ll publish them online and get the discussion moving forward on this important aspect of your security and, hopefully, make your views known to those considering what these increased powers should be. To take the survey please click here.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Protecting your family | No Comments »

What Do You Think ‘Reasonable Force’ Should Constitute?

May 28th, 2010

As we mentioned in our last blog, in the new government’s coalition agreement under the Crime and Policing section it says “We will ensure people have the protection needed when they defend themselves against intruders”.

We’d like to know how far you think the government should go to ensure people’s safety against intruders so we’d like you to take part in a very quick, easy to complete anonymous survey.

Once we have the results in we’ll publish the results online and get the discussion moving forward on this important aspect of your security and, hopefully, make your views known to those considering what these increased powers should be. To take the survey please click here.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Home security | No Comments »

Does The PM Read This Blog?

May 21st, 2010

So can it be that our esteemed new PM and deputy PM read this blog? Only yesterday we called for the new coalition government to concentrate its efforts less on tackling the proliferation of crime-busting CCTV cameras and more on helping householders who find themselves confronting burglars. Then, low and behold, as we were pouring through the new government’s coalition agreement  last night, we found a morsel under the Crime and Policing section that got us excited. “We will ensure people have the protection needed when they defend themselves against intruders”, it says.

Finally some common sense. There is a commitment here. What exactly this commitment means in practice we’ll have to wait and see. But it is there, in writing, so the government now has to be accountable to this.

How far do you think the government should go to ensure people’s safety against intruders? We’d like to hear your comments.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Home security | No Comments »

Nick Clegg Pledges To Ensure CCTV Is “Properly Regulated” In “Big Bang” Reforms

May 20th, 2010

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg yesterday pledged the “biggest shake-up of our democracy” in 178 years, including reforms to ensure CCTV was “properly regulated”.

At the Lib Dem Conference back in September 2008, he said that we have “more surveillance cameras than anywhere in the world”.  It is a sound bite that has been widely quoted in the press, as has one made by David Davis, the former Shadow Home Secretary. In his resignation statement he claimed “there is now a CCTV camera for every 14 people”.

It’s a precise-sounding figure, and one that Davis was far from the first to quote. It’s come up in The Times, The Independent, The Telegraph, The Observer and the Daily Mail, among others. So if it’s so widely reported, it must true, surely?

One camera for every 14 people comes with a partner statistic: that there are 4.2 million security cameras in the UK. The pair of claims come from a relatively old working paper published in 2002, by academics Michael McCahill and Clive Norris. Their figures were guestimates based on the number of cameras in two busy south London streets, Putney High Street and Upper Richmond Road.

However, the authenticity of these figures has been widely questioned. The trade body The CCTV User Group estimates there are currently probably about 1.5m public space surveillance cameras focusing on these areas and it believes the research that lies behind the 4.5 million figure is “extremely questionable”. It says on its web site that “based upon the number of cameras (irrespective of ownership, purpose and field of view) in a small postcode area in Putney, and extrapolated in proportion to the number of businesses in that area compared to the number of businesses in the UK, it can hardly be considered reliable or any true measure of public space surveillance!”

So what is the real figure for the number of CCTV cameras in Britain today? It’s hard to say, as there are no official (or even unofficial) statistics on how many CCTV cameras there are. The Information Commissioner doesn’t know, the previous government repeatedly told parliament that figures are not collected, and any tally of publicly funded cameras wouldn’t cover any small screens set up in the likes of corner shops.

Given that we don’t actually know how many CCTV cameras there are, and given that they have proved so useful in helping catch criminals and monitoring anti-social behaviour, shouldn’t Nick Clegg be focusing on other things in his first keynote speech as a Cabinet Minister? Perhaps increased powers for homeowners so they can defend themselves against armed burglars without the risk of prosecution for assault if they use what is not deemed as “reasonable force”?

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Home security | No Comments »